banner



Home  ›  What Is A Scientist Called Who Observes Animals In Order To Explain Their Behavior Answers.com

What Is A Scientist Called Who Observes Animals In Order To Explain Their Behavior Answers.com

Written By Tuesday, April 26, 2022 Add Comment Edit

Scientific objective study of animal behaviour

A range of animal behaviours

Change in behavior in lizards throughout natural selection

Ethology is the scientific report of beast behaviour, ordinarily with a focus on behaviour nether natural weather, and viewing behaviour as an evolutionarily adaptive trait.[ane] Behaviourism as a term also describes the scientific and objective study of beast behaviour, unremarkably referring to measured responses to stimuli or to trained behavioural responses in a laboratory context, without a particular emphasis on evolutionary adaptivity.[two] Throughout history, different naturalists have studied aspects of creature behaviour. Ethology has its scientific roots in the piece of work of Charles Darwin (1809–1882) and of American and High german ornithologists of the late 19th and early 20th century,[ citation needed ] including Charles O. Whitman, Oskar Heinroth (1871–1945), and Wallace Craig. The modern discipline of ethology is mostly considered to have begun during the 1930s with the work of Dutch biologist Nikolaas Tinbergen (1907–1988) and of Austrian biologists Konrad Lorenz and Karl von Frisch (1886–1982), the three recipients of the 1973 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine.[three] Ethology combines laboratory and field science, with a strong relation to some other disciplines such as neuroanatomy, ecology, and evolutionary biology. Ethologists typically show interest in a behavioural process rather than in a particular animal grouping,[4] and often study one type of behaviour, such as assailment, in a number of unrelated species.

Ethology is a speedily growing field. Since the dawn of the 21st century researchers have re-examined and reached new conclusions in many aspects of animal communication, emotions, civilization, learning and sexuality that the scientific community long thought it understood. New fields, such every bit neuroethology, accept developed.

Agreement ethology or beast behaviour can be important in animal training. Considering the natural behaviours of unlike species or breeds enables trainers to select the individuals best suited to perform the required task. It as well enables trainers to encourage the performance of naturally occurring behaviours and the discontinuance of undesirable behaviours.[v]

Etymology [edit]

The term ethology derives from the Greek linguistic communication: ἦθος, ethos meaning "character" and -λογία , -logia meaning "the study of". The term was first popularized by American myrmecologist (a person who studies ants) William Morton Wheeler in 1902.[6]

History [edit]

The ancestry of ethology [edit]

Charles Darwin (1809–1882) explored the expression of emotions in animals.

Because ethology is considered a topic of biology, ethologists accept been concerned peculiarly with the evolution of behaviour and its understanding in terms of natural selection. In one sense, the first modern ethologist was Charles Darwin, whose 1872 book The Expression of the Emotions in Homo and Animals influenced many ethologists. He pursued his interest in behaviour by encouraging his protégé George Romanes, who investigated creature learning and intelligence using an anthropomorphic method, anecdotal cognitivism, that did not gain scientific support.[7]

Other early ethologists, such as Eugène Marais, Charles O. Whitman, Oskar Heinroth, Wallace Craig and Julian Huxley, instead concentrated on behaviours that can exist chosen instinctive, or natural, in that they occur in all members of a species under specified circumstances. Their outset for studying the behaviour of a new species was to construct an ethogram (a description of the main types of behaviour with their frequencies of occurrence). This provided an objective, cumulative database of behaviour, which subsequent researchers could check and supplement.[6]

Growth of the field [edit]

Due to the piece of work of Konrad Lorenz and Niko Tinbergen, ethology developed strongly in continental Europe during the years prior to World State of war Two.[half dozen] After the war, Tinbergen moved to the University of Oxford, and ethology became stronger in the United kingdom, with the additional influence of William Thorpe, Robert Hinde, and Patrick Bateson at the Sub-department of Animal Behaviour of the University of Cambridge.[8] In this menstruation, too, ethology began to develop strongly in North America.

Lorenz, Tinbergen, and von Frisch were jointly awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1973 for their piece of work of developing ethology.[9]

Ethology is now a well-recognized scientific subject field, and has a number of journals roofing developments in the subject field, such as Animate being Behaviour, Animal Welfare, Applied Fauna Behaviour Scientific discipline, Animate being Cognition, Behaviour, Behavioral Environmental and Ethology: International Journal of Behavioural Biology. In 1972, the International Society for Human being Ethology was founded to promote commutation of knowledge and opinions concerning man behaviour gained by applying ethological principles and methods and published their journal, The Human being Ethology Bulletin. In 2008, in a newspaper published in the periodical Behaviour, ethologist Peter Verbeek introduced the term "Peace Ethology" equally a sub-discipline of Human Ethology that is concerned with issues of homo conflict, conflict resolution, reconciliation, war, peacemaking, and peacekeeping behaviour.[ten]

Social ethology and contempo developments [edit]

In 1972, the English ethologist John H. Crook distinguished comparative ethology from social ethology, and argued that much of the ethology that had existed so far was really comparative ethology—examining animals equally individuals—whereas, in the time to come, ethologists would need to concentrate on the behaviour of social groups of animals and the social construction within them.[eleven]

E. O. Wilson'southward book Sociobiology: The New Synthesis appeared in 1975,[12] and since that time, the written report of behaviour has been much more concerned with social aspects. Information technology has likewise been driven past the stronger, but more sophisticated, Darwinism associated with Wilson, Robert Trivers, and Due west. D. Hamilton. The related development of behavioural ecology has also helped transform ethology.[13] Furthermore, a substantial rapprochement with comparative psychology has occurred, so the modern scientific study of behaviour offers a more or less seamless spectrum of approaches: from animal cognition to more than traditional comparative psychology, ethology, sociobiology, and behavioural ecology. In 2020, Dr. Tobias Starzak and Professor Albert Newen from the Institute of Philosophy 2 at the Ruhr University Bochum postulated that animals may have behavior.[14]

Relationship with comparative psychology [edit]

Comparative psychology also studies animate being behaviour, but, as opposed to ethology, is construed every bit a sub-topic of psychology rather than every bit i of biology. Historically, where comparative psychology has included research on brute behaviour in the context of what is known about human psychology, ethology involves enquiry on animal behaviour in the context of what is known about animate being anatomy, physiology, neurobiology, and phylogenetic history. Furthermore, early comparative psychologists full-bodied on the study of learning and tended to research behaviour in artificial situations, whereas early on ethologists full-bodied on behaviour in natural situations, disposed to describe information technology as instinctive.

The two approaches are complementary rather than competitive, merely they do outcome in different perspectives, and occasionally conflicts of opinion near matters of substance. In addition, for most of the twentieth century, comparative psychology adult most strongly in North America, while ethology was stronger in Europe. From a practical standpoint, early comparative psychologists concentrated on gaining extensive knowledge of the behaviour of very few species. Ethologists were more than interested in understanding behaviour beyond a wide range of species to facilitate principled comparisons across taxonomic groups. Ethologists have fabricated much more than apply of such cross-species comparisons than comparative psychologists take.

Instinct [edit]

Kelp gull chicks peck at red spot on mother's beak to stimulate regurgitating reflex

The Merriam-Webster lexicon defines instinct equally "A largely inheritable and unalterable trend of an organism to make a circuitous and specific response to environmental stimuli without involving reason".[fifteen]

Fixed action patterns [edit]

An important development, associated with the proper name of Konrad Lorenz though probably due more to his teacher, Oskar Heinroth, was the identification of stock-still activity patterns. Lorenz popularized these as instinctive responses that would occur reliably in the presence of identifiable stimuli called sign stimuli or "releasing stimuli". Stock-still action patterns are now considered to be instinctive behavioural sequences that are relatively invariant inside the species and that virtually inevitably run to completion.[16]

One example of a releaser is the beak movements of many bird species performed by newly hatched chicks, which stimulates the mother to regurgitate food for her offspring.[17] Other examples are the classic studies by Tinbergen on the egg-retrieval behaviour and the effects of a "supernormal stimulus" on the behaviour of graylag geese.[xviii] [xix]

One investigation of this kind was the study of the waggle dance ("dance language") in bee communication by Karl von Frisch.[20]

Learning [edit]

Habituation [edit]

Habituation is a simple class of learning and occurs in many animal taxa. Information technology is the procedure whereby an animal ceases responding to a stimulus. Frequently, the response is an innate behaviour. Essentially, the beast learns not to respond to irrelevant stimuli. For example, prairie dogs (Cynomys ludovicianus) requite alarm calls when predators approach, causing all individuals in the group to quickly scramble down burrows. When prairie canis familiaris towns are located near trails used by humans, giving warning calls every time a person walks past is expensive in terms of fourth dimension and energy. Habituation to humans is therefore an important adaptation in this context.[21] [22] [23]

Associative learning [edit]

Associative learning in animal behaviour is any learning process in which a new response becomes associated with a particular stimulus.[24] The first studies of associative learning were fabricated by Russian physiologist Ivan Pavlov, who observed that dogs trained to associate food with the ringing of a bong would salivate on hearing the bell.[25]

Imprinting [edit]

Imprinting enables the immature to discriminate the members of their own species, vital for reproductive success. This of import type of learning only takes place in a very limited period of time. Lorenz observed that the immature of birds such as geese and chickens followed their mothers spontaneously from about the first solar day later they were hatched, and he discovered that this response could be imitated past an arbitrary stimulus if the eggs were incubated artificially and the stimulus were presented during a critical catamenia that continued for a few days subsequently hatching.[26]

Cultural learning [edit]

Observational learning [edit]

Imitation [edit]

Imitation is an advanced behaviour whereby an animal observes and exactly replicates the behaviour of another. The National Institutes of Health reported that capuchin monkeys preferred the visitor of researchers who imitated them to that of researchers who did not. The monkeys not but spent more than time with their imitators just besides preferred to engage in a simple task with them even when provided with the pick of performing the same task with a non-imitator.[27] Imitation has been observed in recent research on chimpanzees; not merely did these chimps copy the actions of another individual, when given a choice, the chimps preferred to imitate the actions of the higher-ranking elder chimpanzee equally opposed to the lower-ranking young chimpanzee.[28]

Stimulus and local enhancement [edit]

There are various ways animals can learn using observational learning simply without the process of imitation. One of these is stimulus enhancement in which individuals go interested in an object as the result of observing others interacting with the object.[29] Increased interest in an object tin consequence in object manipulation which allows for new object-related behaviours by trial-and-error learning. Haggerty (1909) devised an experiment in which a monkey climbed up the side of a muzzle, placed its arm into a wooden chute, and pulled a rope in the chute to release food. Some other monkey was provided an opportunity to obtain the food later on watching a monkey become through this procedure on iv occasions. The monkey performed a unlike method and finally succeeded afterward trial-and-mistake.[30] Another example familiar to some true cat and domestic dog owners is the ability of their animals to open doors. The activeness of humans operating the handle to open the door results in the animals becoming interested in the handle and then by trial-and-mistake, they learn to operate the handle and open the door.

In local enhancement, a demonstrator attracts an observer's attention to a particular location.[31] Local enhancement has been observed to transmit foraging information amidst birds, rats and pigs.[32] The stingless bee (Trigona corvina) uses local enhancement to locate other members of their colony and food resource.[33]

[edit]

A well-documented example of social transmission of a behaviour occurred in a group of macaques on Hachijojima Island, Japan. The macaques lived in the inland forest until the 1960s, when a group of researchers started giving them potatoes on the beach: before long, they started venturing onto the embankment, picking the potatoes from the sand, and cleaning and eating them.[12] Nearly one twelvemonth afterwards, an individual was observed bringing a irish potato to the sea, putting it into the water with one hand, and cleaning it with the other. This behaviour was soon expressed by the individuals living in contact with her; when they gave nascency, this behaviour was also expressed by their young - a form of social transmission.[34]

Educational activity [edit]

Teaching is a highly specialized aspect of learning in which the "teacher" (demonstrator) adjusts their behaviour to increment the probability of the "pupil" (observer) achieving the desired finish-outcome of the behaviour. For case, orcas are known to intentionally embankment themselves to grab pinniped prey.[35] Mother orcas teach their young to catch pinnipeds by pushing them onto the shore and encouraging them to attack the prey. Because the female parent orca is altering her behaviour to help her offspring larn to catch casualty, this is evidence of education.[35] Teaching is not limited to mammals. Many insects, for example, have been observed demonstrating various forms of educational activity to obtain food. Ants, for example, will guide each other to food sources through a process called "tandem running," in which an ant will guide a companion emmet to a source of food.[36] Information technology has been suggested that the pupil emmet is able to learn this road to obtain nutrient in the futurity or teach the route to other ants. This behaviour of education is besides exemplified by crows, specifically New Caledonian crows. The adults (whether private or in families) teach their young adolescent offspring how to construct and use tools. For instance, Pandanus branches are used to extract insects and other larvae from holes within copse.[37]

Mating and the fight for supremacy [edit]

Individual reproduction is the most important phase in the proliferation of individuals or genes within a species: for this reason, there be circuitous mating rituals, which tin can be very complex fifty-fifty if they are often regarded as fixed action patterns. The stickleback'due south complex mating ritual, studied by Tinbergen, is regarded as a notable example.[38]

Often in social life, animals fight for the right to reproduce, as well as social supremacy. A common example of fighting for social and sexual supremacy is the so-called pecking order among poultry. Every fourth dimension a group of poultry cohabitate for a sure time length, they constitute a pecking order. In these groups, 1 craven dominates the others and tin can peck without being pecked. A 2d chicken tin peck all the others except the first, and then on. Chickens higher in the pecking order may at times exist distinguished by their healthier advent when compared to lower level chickens.[ citation needed ] While the pecking gild is establishing, frequent and violent fights tin can happen, but once established, it is broken only when other individuals enter the group, in which case the pecking social club re-establishes from scratch.[39]

Living in groups [edit]

Several animal species, including humans, tend to alive in groups. Group size is a major aspect of their social environment. Social life is probably a complex and constructive survival strategy. It may exist regarded as a sort of symbiosis among individuals of the same species: a society is equanimous of a group of individuals belonging to the same species living within well-defined rules on food management, role assignments and reciprocal dependence.

When biologists interested in evolution theory first started examining social behaviour, some apparently unanswerable questions arose, such as how the birth of sterile castes, like in bees, could exist explained through an evolving mechanism that emphasizes the reproductive success of every bit many individuals as possible, or why, amongst animals living in small groups like squirrels, an private would hazard its own life to relieve the rest of the group. These behaviours may be examples of altruism.[40] Of course, not all behaviours are altruistic, as indicated by the table below. For example, revengeful behaviour was at one point claimed to have been observed exclusively in Homo sapiens. Notwithstanding, other species take been reported to exist vengeful including chimpanzees,[41] as well as anecdotal reports of vengeful camels.[42]

Classification of social behaviours[ commendation needed ]
Blazon of behaviour Consequence on the donor Effect on the receiver
Egoistic Neutral to Increases fitness Decreases fitness
Cooperative Neutral to Increases fitness Neutral to Increases fettle
Altruistic Decreases fitness Neutral to Increases fitness
Revengeful Decreases fitness Decreases fettle

Donating behaviour has been explained past the gene-centred view of development.[43] [44]

Benefits and costs of group living [edit]

One reward of group living can be decreased predation. If the number of predator attacks stays the same despite increasing prey group size, each prey may have a reduced chance of predator attacks through the dilution issue.[thirteen] [ page needed ] Further, according to the selfish herd theory, the fitness benefits associated with group living vary depending on the location of an individual within the group. The theory suggests that conspecifics positioned at the eye of a group will reduce the likelihood predations while those at the periphery will become more vulnerable to attack.[45] Additionally, a predator that is confused by a mass of individuals can detect it more difficult to unmarried out i target. For this reason, the zebra's stripes offer not merely cover-up in a habitat of tall grasses, but also the advantage of blending into a herd of other zebras.[46] In groups, prey can also actively reduce their predation risk through more effective defence tactics, or through earlier detection of predators through increased vigilance.[13]

Another advantage of group living can be an increased ability to fodder for nutrient. Grouping members may exchange information about food sources between one another, facilitating the process of resource location.[13] [ page needed ] Honeybees are a notable instance of this, using the waggle trip the light fantastic to communicate the location of flowers to the rest of their hive.[47] Predators besides receive benefits from hunting in groups, through using better strategies and existence able to accept down larger casualty.[13] [ page needed ]

Some disadvantages back-trail living in groups. Living in close proximity to other animals tin can facilitate the transmission of parasites and affliction, and groups that are too large may also experience greater competition for resources and mates.[48]

Group size [edit]

Theoretically, social animals should take optimal group sizes that maximize the benefits and minimize the costs of group living. However, in nature, most groups are stable at slightly larger than optimal sizes.[13] [ page needed ] Because it generally benefits an private to join an optimally-sized grouping, despite slightly decreasing the advantage for all members, groups may continue to increase in size until it is more advantageous to remain alone than to bring together an overly full group.[49]

Tinbergen'due south four questions for ethologists [edit]

Niko Tinbergen argued that ethology always needed to include four kinds of explanation in any instance of behaviour:[50] [51]

  • Function – How does the behaviour affect the beast's chances of survival and reproduction? Why does the creature respond that mode instead of some other way?
  • Causation – What are the stimuli that elicit the response, and how has it been modified past recent learning?
  • Development – How does the behaviour change with age, and what early experiences are necessary for the animal to brandish the behaviour?
  • Evolutionary history – How does the behaviour compare with similar behaviour in related species, and how might it accept begun through the process of phylogeny?

These explanations are complementary rather than mutually exclusive—all instances of behaviour require an explanation at each of these four levels. For case, the function of eating is to acquire nutrients (which ultimately aids survival and reproduction), but the immediate cause of eating is hunger (causation). Hunger and eating are evolutionarily aboriginal and are constitute in many species (evolutionary history), and develop early within an organism's lifespan (development). Information technology is piece of cake to confuse such questions—for case, to argue that people consume because they're hungry and not to acquire nutrients—without realizing that the reason people experience hunger is because it causes them to larn nutrients.[52]

See also [edit]

  • Anthrozoology
  • Behavioral ecology
  • Cognitive ethology
  • Deception in animals
  • Human ethology
  • List of abnormal behaviours in animals

References [edit]

  1. ^ "Definition of ethology". Merriam-Webster . Retrieved 9 September 2016.
  2. ^ "Definition of behaviorism". Merriam-Webster . Retrieved nine September 2016.
    "Behaviourism". Oxford Dictionaries. Retrieved 9 September 2016.
  3. ^ "The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1973". Nobelprize.org . Retrieved 9 September 2016. The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1973 was awarded jointly to Karl von Frisch, Konrad Lorenz and Nikolaas Tinbergen 'for their discoveries apropos organisation and elicitation of individual and social behaviour patterns'.
  4. ^ Gomez-Marin, Alex; Paton, Joseph J; Kampff, Adam R; Costa, Rui G; Mainen, Zachary F (28 Oct 2014). "Big behavioral information: psychology, ethology and the foundations of neuroscience" (PDF). Nature Neuroscience. 17 (eleven): 1455–1462. doi:10.1038/nn.3812. ISSN 1097-6256. PMID 25349912. S2CID 10300952.
  5. ^ McGreevy, Paul; Boakes, Robert (2011). Carrots and Sticks: Principles of Animal Preparation. Darlington Press. pp. xi–23. ISBN978-1-921364-15-0 . Retrieved ix September 2016.
  6. ^ a b c Matthews, Janice R.; Matthews, Robert W. (2009). Insect Behaviour. Springer. p. 13. ISBN978-90-481-2388-9.
  7. ^ Keeley, Brian L. (2004). "Anthropomorphism, primatomorphism, mammalomorphism: understanding cross-species comparisons" (PDF). York Academy. p. 527. Archived (PDF) from the original on 17 December 2008. Retrieved 19 Dec 2008.
  8. ^ Bateson, Patrick (1991). The Evolution and Integration of Behaviour: Essays in Honour of Robert Hinde. Cambridge University Press. p. 479. ISBN978-0-521-40709-0.
  9. ^ Encyclopædia Britannica (1975). Yearbook of scientific discipline and the future . p. 248. ISBN9780852293072.
  10. ^ Verbeek, Peter (2008). "Peace Ethology". Behaviour. 145 (11): 1497–1524. doi:ten.1163/156853908786131270.
  11. ^ Crook, John H.; Goss-Custard, J. D. (1972). "Social Ethology". Almanac Review of Psychology. 23 (i): 277–312. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.23.020172.001425.
  12. ^ a b Wilson, Edward O. (2000). Sociobiology: the new synthesis. Harvard University Press. p. 170. ISBN978-0-674-00089-6.
  13. ^ a b c d e f Davies, Nicholas B.; Krebs, John R.; West, Stuart A. (2012). An Introduction to Behavioural Environmental (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons. ISBN978-1-4443-3949-ix.
  14. ^ "What it means when animals have beliefs". ScienceDaily. 17 June 2020. Retrieved 18 June 2020.
  15. ^ "Instinct". Merriam-Webster Dictionary.
  16. ^ Campbell, Due north. A. (1996). "Chapter 50". Biology (iv ed.). Benjamin Cummings, New York. ISBN978-0-8053-1957-6.
  17. ^ Bernstein, Due west. Grand. (2011). A Basic Theory of Neuropsychoanalysis. Karnac Books. p. 81. ISBN978-1-85575-809-4.
  18. ^ Tinbergen, Niko (1951). The Written report of Instinct. Oxford University Press, New York.
  19. ^ Tinbergen, Niko (1953). The Herring Dupe'due south World. Collins, London.
  20. ^ Buchmann, Stephen (2006). Letters from the Hive: An Intimate History of Bees, Honey, and Humankind. Random House of Canada. p. 105. ISBN978-0-553-38266-2.
  21. ^ Breed, Yard. D. (2001). "Habituation". Retrieved 9 September 2014.
  22. ^ Keil, Frank C.; Wilson, Robert Andrew (2001). The MIT encyclopedia of the cognitive sciences . MIT Press. p. 184. ISBN978-0-262-73144-vii.
  23. ^ Bouton, M. East. (2007). Learning and behavior: A gimmicky synthesis. Sunderland. Archived from the original on 31 August 2016. Retrieved 9 September 2016.
  24. ^ "Associative learning". Encyclopædia Britannica . Retrieved 9 September 2014.
  25. ^ Hudmon, Andrew (2005). Learning and retentiveness . Infobase Publishing. p. 35. ISBN978-0-7910-8638-4.
  26. ^ Mercer, Jean (2006). Understanding zipper: parenting, child care, and emotional development. Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 19. ISBN978-0-275-98217-1.
  27. ^ "Imitation Promotes Social Bonding in Primates, August thirteen, 2009 News Release". National Institutes of Health. 13 August 2009. Archived from the original on 22 August 2009. Retrieved 8 November 2011.
  28. ^ Horner, Victoria; et al. (19 May 2010). "Prestige Affects Cultural Learning in Chimpanzees". PLOS One. 5 (v): e10625. Bibcode:2010PLoSO...510625H. doi:x.1371/journal.pone.0010625. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC2873264. PMID 20502702.
  29. ^ Spence, K. W. (1937). "Experimental studies of learning and higher mental processes in infra-homo primates". Psychological Message. 34 (10): 806–850. doi:10.1037/h0061498.
  30. ^ Haggerty, M. Eastward. (1909). "Imitation in monkeys". Periodical of Comparative Neurology and Psychology. 19 (4): 337–455. doi:ten.1002/cne.920190402.
  31. ^ Hoppitt, W.; Laland, K. N. (2013). Social Learning: An Introduction to Mechanisms, Methods, and Models. Princeton University Press. ISBN978-i-4008-4650-iv.
  32. ^ Galef, B. G.; Giraldeau, L.-A. (2001). "Social influences on foraging in vertebrates: Causal mechanisms and adaptive functions". Beast Behaviour. 61 (one): 3–fifteen. doi:10.1006/anbe.2000.1557. PMID 11170692. S2CID 38321280.
  33. ^ F.G.J. Sommerlandt; Westward. Huber; J. Spaethe (2014). "Social information in the Stingless Bee, Trigona corvina Cockerell (Hymenoptera: Apidae): The use of visual and olfactory cues at the food site". Sociobiology. 61 (4): 401–406. doi:10.13102/sociobiology.v61i4.401-406. ISSN 0361-6525.
  34. ^ "Japanese Macaque - Macaca fuscata". Blueplanetbiomes.org. Retrieved 8 November 2011.
  35. ^ a b Rendell, Luke; Whitehead, Hal (2001). "Culture in whales and dolphins" (PDF). Behavioral and Encephalon Sciences. 24 (ii): 309–324. doi:10.1017/s0140525x0100396x. PMID 11530544. S2CID 24052064.
  36. ^ Hoppitt, West. J.; Brown, G. R.; Kendal, R.; Rendell, L.; Thornton, A.; Webster, Grand. Yard.; Laland, K. N. (2008). "Lessons from brute pedagogy". Trends in Ecology & Development. 23 (9): 486–93. doi:x.1016/j.tree.2008.05.008. PMID 18657877.
  37. ^ Rutz, Christian; Barefaced, Lucas A.; Reed, Nicola; Troscianko, Jolyon; Newton, Jason; Inger, Richard; Kacelnik, Alex; Bearhop, Stuart (September 2010). "The Ecological Significance of Tool Use in New Caledonian Crows". Scientific discipline. 329 (5998): 1523–1526. Bibcode:2010Sci...329.1523R. doi:x.1126/science.1192053. PMID 20847272. S2CID 8888382.
  38. ^ Tinbergen, Niko; Van Iersel, J. J. A. (1947). "'Displacement Reactions' in the Three-Spined Stickleback". Behaviour. one (1): 56–63. doi:x.1163/156853948X00038. JSTOR 4532675.
  39. ^ Rajecki, D. Due west. (1988). "Formation of leap orders in pairs of male domestic chickens". Ambitious Behavior. 14 (vi): 425–436. doi:10.1002/1098-2337(1988)14:half dozen<425::Help-AB2480140604>3.0.CO;two-#.
  40. ^ Cummings, Marking; Zahn-Waxler, Carolyn; Iannotti, Ronald (1991). Altruism and aggression: biological and social origins . Cambridge University Press. p. 7. ISBN978-0-521-42367-0.
  41. ^ McCullough, Michael E. (2008). Across Revenge: The Evolution of the Forgiveness Instinct. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 79–eighty. ISBN978-0-470-26215-3.
  42. ^ De Waal, Frans (2001). The Ape and the Sushi Primary: Cultural Reflections by a Primatologist . Basic Books. p. 338. ISBN978-0-465-04176-three . Retrieved 27 Dec 2016.
  43. ^ Dawkins, Richard (January 1979). "Twelve Misunderstandings of Kin Pick". Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie. 51 (2): 184–200. doi:ten.1111/j.1439-0310.1979.tb00682.x.
  44. ^ Ågren, J. Arvid (2016). "Selfish genetic elements and the gene'southward-eye view of development". Current Zoology. 62 (6): 659–665. doi:10.1093/cz/zow102. ISSN 1674-5507. PMC5804262. PMID 29491953.
  45. ^ Hamilton, W. D. (1971). "Geometry for the Selfish Herd". Periodical of Theoretical Biological science. 31 (2): 295–311. doi:x.1016/0022-5193(71)90189-5. PMID 5104951.
  46. ^ "How do a zebra'southward stripes deed as camouflage?". HowStuffWorks.com. fifteen Apr 2008. Retrieved 26 December 2016.
  47. ^ Riley, J.; Greggers, U.; Smith, A.; Reynolds, D. R.; Menzel, R. (2005). "The flying paths of honeybees recruited past the waggle dance". Nature. 435 (7039): 205–207. Bibcode:2005Natur.435..205R. doi:10.1038/nature03526. PMID 15889092. S2CID 4413962.
  48. ^ Rathads, Triana (29 August 2007). "A Wait at Animate being Social Groups". Scientific discipline 360. Archived from the original on 8 May 2014. Retrieved 22 April 2014.
  49. ^ Sibley, R. M. (1983). "Optimal grouping size is unstable". Animal Behaviour. 31 (3): 947–948. doi:10.1016/s0003-3472(83)80250-4. S2CID 54387192.
  50. ^ Tinbergen, Niko (1963). "On aims and methods in ethology". Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie. 20 (4): 410–433. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.1963.tb01161.x.
  51. ^ MacDougall-Shackleton, Scott A. (27 July 2011). "The levels of analysis revisited". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Lodge B: Biological Sciences. 366 (1574): 2076–2085. doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0363. PMC3130367. PMID 21690126.
  52. ^ Barrett et al. (2002) Human Evolutionary Psychology. Princeton University Printing.

Farther reading [edit]

  • Burkhardt, Richard W. Jr. "On the Emergence of Ethology as a Scientific Subject field." Conspectus of History 1.7 (1981).

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethology#:~:text=Ethologists%20typically%20show%20interest%20in,is%20a%20rapidly%20growing%20field.

Posted by: urbanekunked1956.blogspot.com

0 Response to "What Is A Scientist Called Who Observes Animals In Order To Explain Their Behavior Answers.com"

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel